Skip to main content

Is Ambivalence A Strength or A Problem To Solve? Yes.

      One of my favorite Seinfeld episodes - The Nose Job - has Jerry involved with a stunning woman he is attracted to and dislikes with equal intensity. She's ignorant, bigoted, physically perfect, and sexually electric. There are some things about dating this woman that are truly spectacular for Jerry, so the conflict doesn't quite rise to the high stakes of Shakespeare's Hamlet - whose tortured paralysis of analysis was about whether or not to commit murder. It doesn't even rise to the level of head vs heart. It's chemistry vs character. Episodes of self-loathing vs fantasies fulfilled. In the end, it is her terrible acting that tips the balance of awfulness just enough for him to break it off. At least he has some standards
     Stay put or make a move. Desire or integrity. Familiarity or adventure. Deep emotional ties or freedom from commitment. The inner tensions between opposite but
by Jude Treder-Wolff, LCSW, RMT, CGP
@JuTrWolff
equal "wants" is part of most important decisions, and a sadly under-rated element of conscious choice-making.
 Ambivalence can be woven into the process of change at every stage, if for no other reason than taking action in a new direction means giving up something else. Want that promotion and the nice pay-raise, but do not want the added pressure. Relish the joys of parenting, resent the loss of freedom. Its not crazy to feel mixed emotions about the things we want the most in life - its crazy not to, and it feels crazier when we try to deny or suppress the conflict.
     Dutch reseacher Frenk van Harreveld, of the University of Amsterdam’s Uncertainty Lab found evidence of the biochemical stress response - which can be induced by a psychological threat as much as a physiological one - in ambivalent individuals who were pressured to settle on a point of view. "This discomfort only increased once they had committed," writes Ian Leslie on Slate.com. "They literally sweated over their decision." He writes that, according to Van Harreveld, "for the ambivalent person to commit to a position, even though the decision has no consequence, is inevitably painful: 'If you believe two things at once and you’re forced to give one up, then you will experience a sense of loss.'"
      The creative process provides a template for how to use ambivalence, but its tricky. We need to look at it in a glass-half full kind of way. Or is it a glass half-empty. You decide. Letting go of control over outcomes makes creative work both intensely demanding and intrinsically rewarding. We bring our knowledge, skill and all of our experiences to the process. That's the glass half-full. Then there is the empty canvas, the blank page, the unstructured improvisation - glass half empty. This is our own personal uncertainty lab. We take some action, always a risk of course. Without risk, nothing interesting can happen. But risk raises anxiety. Anxiety can trigger the stress response, which derails the pre-frontal cortex and disables our capacity to think creatively, reinforcing the fear of failure and shutting down the capacity to risk. To let go of control enough for creative energy to flow means dealing in some new way with the sense of threat we have managed by holding onto control. At least we have the perception of some degree of control over how things turn out.  Aiming for perfection is another popular choice to avoid feeling threatened, but that leads to another kind of paralysis. The paralysis of needing to know how the story ends while the chapter is being written. 

    So with the creative process we acknowledge that we are unsafe, uncertain and bound to trip over something painful or at least unsettling. We think about control and structure and perfection as potential end states that might be redefined by creative action and redefined yet again before we are finished. This sounds like an insane choice unless you think about the alternative position, trying to achieve the unachievable - consistency, control, perfection, and the illusion of safety  - as a way to avoid the unavoidable. 
        Ambivalence is dueling discomforts and emotional pulls in equal but opposite directions, but it is also part of an honest examination of our options. It is the curse of the conscientious, the realm of the reflective and thoughtful. The self-satisfied and smug are spared this internal tension. The true believer faced with facts that could shatter his worldview will simply reject them. A true scientist accepts the uncertainty of the scientific method, "where the things we know and the things we don't know collide, and we are left to figure out how to use what we have to make decisions anyway," writes Maggie Koerth-Baker in "A Twist on Climate Change, Risk, and Uncertainty" on the World Science Festival blog. "That process is so confusing that researchers like Gerd Gigerenzer, director of the Max Planck Institute for Human Development in Berlin, actually make their careers studying the psychology behind it."
    And there is increasing evidence that there are real benefits and life skills available through struggling out our love/hate relationship to ambivalence. The Academy of Management Journal published a study showing that employees with the capacity to tolerate dueling ideas and conflicting emotions contributed more creative thinking. "Primarily happy or sad workers, or those who lack an emotional response, might not have this increased sensitivity for recognizing unusual associations," states Christine Ting Fong, of the University of Washington Business School and lead author of the study. "Rather than assuming ambivalence will lead to negative results for the organization, managers should recognize that emotional ambivalence can have positive consequences that can be leveraged for organizational success." The Journal of Clinical Psychology published a study showing that psychotherapy clients who acknowledged both the costs and the benefits of change achieved better outcomes than those who acknowledged benefits but not costs, or weighed in on the costs but could not examine the benefits. 
     F. Scott Fitzgerald said that “the test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in mind at the same time and still retain the ability to function.” There have never been so many interesting choices in life as we have today. Its fantastic and its overwhelming. It may be difficult to play with dueling ideas and mixed emotions, but there is no better training for creating in the real time complexities we face every day.



@JuTrWolff


Jude Treder-Wolff is a trainer/consultant and writer/performer. She is host and creator of (mostly) TRUE THINGS storytelling slam.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Improvisation Games & Exercises For Developing Emotional Intelligence

Since September Lifestage has been offering a monthly training workshop exploring the use of improvisation to develop Emotional Intelligence. These workshops have been geared toward the work done by clinicians, educators and trainers who guide the process of personal change or professional development, but as it turns out we have enjoyed some interesting diversity among the participants -  managers, business owners with both employees and customers, community activists, and performers. 
    Below is a collection of the exercises we have used in the workshops, accompanied by some studies that supports their use. 


Why Improvisation?
Improvisation is a powerful way to become aware of mental habits and patterns. Reflecting on our inner experiences after engaging in an improvisation exercise provides an opportunity to decide whether our mental habits are effective and useful or self-limiting and obsolete. The tensions of the creative process and this kind of interpersonal interaction are a fa…

WARM-UP EXERCISES FOR GROUP WORK - For Therapeutic, Educational or Training Groups

Nicholas Wolff, LCSW, BCD, TEP, Director of Training at Lifestage, Inc and Jude Treder-Wolff, LCSW, RMT, CGP, Trainer/consultant and writer/performer. Follow on twitter @JuTrWolff


   “To begin assembly one must have the right attitude,” goes a Japanese instruction for assembling a particular object, as quoted in Zen and the Art of Motorcyle Maintenance. The "right attitude" is one that best serves the action we are preparing to engage in, just as an athlete warms up his/her muscles before using them in the stress of a work-out or game. Psychological and emotional "muscles" that are properly warmed up will perform more effectively and make it less likely that we will experience strain or allow fear to produce a shut-out when things get rolling.
    The right warm-up makes everything learned in a training situation or classroom more accessible and immediately useful to the trainee/student. New skills and knowledge - in education, personal growth or a professional train…

The Emotional Intelligence of Nelson Mandela

Nelson Mandela famously forgave the people who imprisoned him, an extraordinary thing especially since they were willing actors in an abusive system, one that imposed decades of indescribable suffering and violence on millions of his people. He forgave Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher for doing business with the apartheid regimeand would probably forgive members of the U.S. Congress and political pundits who labeled him a Communist and terrorist even upon the announcement of his death. 
     There were American diplomats who ignored the ignored the brutality and violence of the apartheid government and supported his imprisonment. Most of us would find that hard to take. Most of us struggle to accept being misjudged or unfairly labeled even when the consequences are simply emotional tensions. And in our sound bite culture, there is a rush to idolize a person with such a remarkable emotional capacity. We might miss the ways he was exactly like the rest of us and in doing that miss als…